Why prove anything
1.[2p] Euler's expression is prime for every from to . Why does it fail at ?
Euler's expression is prime for every from to . Why does it fail at ?
The answer is: , so the value is
The answer is: , so the value is
The answer is: , so the value is
2.[1p] Six points on a circle, joined by every chord with no three chords meeting at one interior point, cut the disc into regions.
Six points on a circle, joined by every chord with no three chords meeting at one interior point, cut the disc into regions.
The answer is: False
3.[1p] What is the smallest greater than for which Pólya's conjecture fails, found by Minoru Tanaka in 1980?
What is the smallest greater than for which Pólya's conjecture fails, found by Minoru Tanaka in 1980?
The answer is: 906,150,257
The answer is: 906,150,257
The answer is: 906,150,257
4.[2p] Which of these may justify a line of a proof?
Which of these may justify a line of a proof?
Select all that apply
The answer is: A definition, An axiom, A result that has already been proved
The answer is: A definition, An axiom, A result that has already been proved
5.[3p] Match each term to its definition.
Match each term to its definition.
Even integer
Odd integer
Prime
Composite
greater than , with only and itself as positive divisors
a product of two integers each greater than
equal to for some integer
equal to for some integer
Show the answer
Even integer: equal to for some integer Odd integer: equal to for some integer Prime: greater than , with only and itself as positive divisors Composite: a product of two integers each greater than
6.[1p] By the definition of even, is even.
By the definition of even, is even.
The answer is: True
7.[2p] Put the lines of this proof that the sum of two even integers is even in order.
Put the lines of this proof that the sum of two even integers is even in order.
Let and be even integers.
Since and are integers, so is .
Then .
So is twice an integer, and by the definition of even, it is even.
By the definition of even, and for some integers and .
Show the answer
a, b, c, d, e
8.[2p] A proof that the sum of two odd integers is even begins "Let and ." What is wrong with it?
A proof that the sum of two odd integers is even begins "Let and ." What is wrong with it?
The answer is: Using the same for both forces , so it proves the claim only for a number added to itself
The answer is: Using the same for both forces , so it proves the claim only for a number added to itself
The answer is: Using the same for both forces , so it proves the claim only for a number added to itself
9.[3p] Which of these statements about evidence and proof are correct?
Which of these statements about evidence and proof are correct?
Select all that apply
The answer is: A single counterexample refutes a claim about every natural number, One proof can establish infinitely many cases at once, A proof's conclusions hold only under the assumptions it starts from
10.[1p] Seven points on a circle are joined by every chord, with no three chords meeting at one interior point. How many regions do the chords cut the disc into?
Seven points on a circle are joined by every chord, with no three chords meeting at one interior point. How many regions do the chords cut the disc into?
11.[2p] What is unusual about the refutation of the Mertens conjecture, that for every ?
What is unusual about the refutation of the Mertens conjecture, that for every ?
The answer is: It was proved false in 1985, yet no single that breaks it is known
The answer is: It was proved false in 1985, yet no single that breaks it is known
The answer is: It was proved false in 1985, yet no single that breaks it is known
12.[1p] Checking by multiplication that is a complete proof that is not prime.
Checking by multiplication that is a complete proof that is not prime.
The answer is: True
13.[3p] Match each word to the role of the statement it names.
Match each word to the role of the statement it names.
Axiom
Lemma
Corollary
Conjecture
follows with little extra work from a theorem just proved
accepted without proof, as a starting point
proved mainly to help prove something else
believed by someone, but not yet proved
Show the answer
Axiom: accepted without proof, as a starting point Lemma: proved mainly to help prove something else Corollary: follows with little extra work from a theorem just proved Conjecture: believed by someone, but not yet proved
14.[2p] The proof from the axioms that begins by writing . Which axiom turns that into ?
The proof from the axioms that begins by writing . Which axiom turns that into ?
The answer is: The distributive law,
The answer is: The distributive law,
The answer is: The distributive law,