Induction
1.[1p] To prove for every natural number by induction, what must the inductive step establish?
To prove for every natural number by induction, what must the inductive step establish?
The answer is: For an arbitrary natural number , if is true then is true
The answer is: For an arbitrary natural number , if is true then is true
The answer is: For an arbitrary natural number , if is true then is true
2.[1p] For the statement " is odd", the inductive step can be proved, so the statement is true for every natural number .
For the statement " is odd", the inductive step can be proved, so the statement is true for every natural number .
The answer is: False
3.[2p] The proof that induction is valid takes , the least natural number for which fails. Why can not be ?
The proof that induction is valid takes , the least natural number for which fails. Why can not be ?
The answer is: Because the base case says is true
The answer is: Because the base case says is true
The answer is: Because the base case says is true
4.[1p] What is the smallest natural number such that for every ?
What is the smallest natural number such that for every ?
5.[1p] Use the formula to find .
Use the formula to find .
6.[2p] Put the lines of the proof that for every natural number in order.
Put the lines of the proof that for every natural number in order.
Expanding, .
So .
For the base case, , which is a multiple of .
The middle term is a multiple of , since is even, so for some integer .
By induction, for every natural number .
For the step, assume for some integer .
Show the answer
a, b, c, d, e, f
7.[3p] Match each claim to the base case its induction needs.
Match each claim to the base case its induction needs.
for every natural number
for every
Every integer is a product of primes
for the Fibonacci numbers
only
only
both and
only
Show the answer
for every natural number : only for every : only Every integer is a product of primes: only for the Fibonacci numbers: both and
8.[3p] Which of these are true of strong induction?
Which of these are true of strong induction?
Select all that apply
The answer is: The step may assume for every from the base case up to , It proves nothing that ordinary induction cannot, applied to " through all hold", It is what the proof that every is a product of primes needs, since calls on and
The answer is: The step may assume for every from the base case up to , It proves nothing that ordinary induction cannot, applied to " through all hold", It is what the proof that every is a product of primes needs, since calls on and
9.[2p] The "proof" that all horses are one colour has a true base case. Where exactly does it fail?
The "proof" that all horses are one colour has a true base case. Where exactly does it fail?
The answer is: In the step from to : the two groups of one horse do not overlap
The answer is: In the step from to : the two groups of one horse do not overlap
The answer is: In the step from to : the two groups of one horse do not overlap
10.[1p] Use the identity to find , where and .
Use the identity to find , where and .
11.[1p] What is the largest whole number of pence that cannot be paid exactly with 3p and 5p stamps?
What is the largest whole number of pence that cannot be paid exactly with 3p and 5p stamps?
12.[2p] A direct induction on "" fails, while one on "" succeeds. Why?
A direct induction on "" fails, while one on "" succeeds. Why?
The answer is: The stronger statement is also a stronger inductive hypothesis: it says how much room is left below , which the step needs
The answer is: The stronger statement is also a stronger inductive hypothesis: it says how much room is left below , which the step needs
The answer is: The stronger statement is also a stronger inductive hypothesis: it says how much room is left below , which the step needs
13.[1p] Every non-empty set of non-negative rational numbers has a least element.
Every non-empty set of non-negative rational numbers has a least element.
The answer is: False
14.[2p] To prove by structural induction that every propositional formula built from variables with , and has some property, what must be shown?
To prove by structural induction that every propositional formula built from variables with , and has some property, what must be shown?
The answer is: Every variable has the property, and if and have it then so do , and
The answer is: Every variable has the property, and if and have it then so do , and
The answer is: Every variable has the property, and if and have it then so do , and