Sign in

Libre University uses your GitHub account. Signing in is only needed to sit a final test, so the score is kept on your profile.

Induction

1.[1p]

To prove P(n) for every natural number n by induction, what must the inductive step establish?

Correct

The answer is: For an arbitrary natural number n, if P(n) is true then P(n+1) is true

The answer is: For an arbitrary natural number n, if P(n) is true then P(n+1) is true

The answer is: For an arbitrary natural number n, if P(n) is true then P(n+1) is true

2.[1p]

For the statement "n2+n is odd", the inductive step P(n)⇒P(n+1) can be proved, so the statement is true for every natural number n.

The answer is: False

Correct

3.[2p]

The proof that induction is valid takes m, the least natural number for which P(m) fails. Why can m not be 1?

Correct

The answer is: Because the base case says P(1) is true

The answer is: Because the base case says P(1) is true

The answer is: Because the base case says P(1) is true

4.[1p]

What is the smallest natural number n0 such that 2n>n2 for every n≥n0?

CorrectNot quite: 5

5.[1p]

Use the formula 12+22+⋯+n2=n(n+1)(2n+1)6 to find 12+22+⋯+202.

CorrectNot quite: 2870

6.[2p]

Put the lines of the proof that 6∣n3+5n for every natural number n in order.

  1. Expanding, (n+1)3+5(n+1)=(n3+5n)+3(n2+n)+6.

  2. So (n+1)3+5(n+1)=6k+6m+6=6(k+m+1).

  3. For the base case, 13+5×1=6, which is a multiple of 6.

  4. The middle term is a multiple of 6, since n2+n is even, so n2+n=2m for some integer m.

  5. By induction, 6∣n3+5n for every natural number n.

  6. For the step, assume n3+5n=6k for some integer k.

Show the answer

a, b, c, d, e, f

7.[3p]

Match each claim to the base case its induction needs.

  • 1+2+⋯+n=n(n+1)2 for every natural number n

  • 2n>n2 for every n≥5

  • Every integer n≥2 is a product of primes

  • Fn<2n for the Fibonacci numbers

  • n=5 only

  • n=1 only

  • both n=1 and n=2

  • n=2 only

Show the answer

1+2+⋯+n=n(n+1)2 for every natural number n: n=1 only 2n>n2 for every n≥5: n=5 only Every integer n≥2 is a product of primes: n=2 only Fn<2n for the Fibonacci numbers: both n=1 and n=2

8.[3p]

Which of these are true of strong induction?

Select all that apply

Correct
Correct
Correct

The answer is: The step may assume P(k) for every k from the base case up to n, It proves nothing that ordinary induction cannot, applied to "P(1) through P(n) all hold", It is what the proof that every n≥2 is a product of primes needs, since n+1=ab calls on a and b

The answer is: The step may assume P(k) for every k from the base case up to n, It proves nothing that ordinary induction cannot, applied to "P(1) through P(n) all hold", It is what the proof that every n≥2 is a product of primes needs, since n+1=ab calls on a and b

9.[2p]

The "proof" that all horses are one colour has a true base case. Where exactly does it fail?

Correct

The answer is: In the step from n=1 to n=2: the two groups of one horse do not overlap

The answer is: In the step from n=1 to n=2: the two groups of one horse do not overlap

The answer is: In the step from n=1 to n=2: the two groups of one horse do not overlap

10.[1p]

Use the identity F1+F2+⋯+Fn=Fn+2−1 to find F1+F2+⋯+F10, where F1=F2=1 and Fn+2=Fn+1+Fn.

CorrectNot quite: 143

11.[1p]

What is the largest whole number of pence that cannot be paid exactly with 3p and 5p stamps?

CorrectNot quite: 7

12.[2p]

A direct induction on "∑k=1n1k2<2" fails, while one on "∑k=1n1k2≤2−1n" succeeds. Why?

Correct

The answer is: The stronger statement is also a stronger inductive hypothesis: it says how much room is left below 2, which the step needs

The answer is: The stronger statement is also a stronger inductive hypothesis: it says how much room is left below 2, which the step needs

The answer is: The stronger statement is also a stronger inductive hypothesis: it says how much room is left below 2, which the step needs

13.[1p]

Every non-empty set of non-negative rational numbers has a least element.

The answer is: False

Correct

14.[2p]

To prove by structural induction that every propositional formula built from variables with ¬, ∧ and ∨ has some property, what must be shown?

Correct

The answer is: Every variable has the property, and if φ and ψ have it then so do ¬φ, (φ∧ψ) and (φ∨ψ)

The answer is: Every variable has the property, and if φ and ψ have it then so do ¬φ, (φ∧ψ) and (φ∨ψ)

The answer is: Every variable has the property, and if φ and ψ have it then so do ¬φ, (φ∧ψ) and (φ∨ψ)