Direct proof and proof by cases
1.[1p] How should a direct proof of "for every integer , if is odd then is odd" begin?
How should a direct proof of "for every integer , if is odd then is odd" begin?
The answer is: Let be an odd integer.
The answer is: Let be an odd integer.
The answer is: Let be an odd integer.
2.[2p] Which of these statements are true?
Which of these statements are true?
Select all that apply
The answer is: , , ,
The answer is: , , ,
3.[2p] Put the lines of this proof that if and then in order.
Put the lines of this proof that if and then in order.
By definition, and for some integers and .
Let , and be integers with and .
Substituting, .
Since and are integers, so is .
So is times an integer, and by definition .
Show the answer
a, b, c, d, e
4.[1p] A proof of that treats only the case and the case is complete.
A proof of that treats only the case and the case is complete.
The answer is: False
5.[2p] The proof that every odd square is one more than a multiple of writes and gets . What finishes it?
The proof that every odd square is one more than a multiple of writes and gets . What finishes it?
The answer is: The earlier result that is even for every integer
The answer is: The earlier result that is even for every integer
The answer is: The earlier result that is even for every integer
6.[3p] Match each claim to the method its proof in the lesson used.
Match each claim to the method its proof in the lesson used.
If and then
is even for every integer
for all reals
For every there are consecutive non-primes
Some irrational and have rational
cases on signs
a non-constructive existence proof
a constructive existence proof
a direct proof from the definition
cases on parity
Show the answer
If and then : a direct proof from the definition is even for every integer : cases on parity for all reals: cases on signs For every there are consecutive non-primes: a constructive existence proof Some irrational and have rational: a non-constructive existence proof
7.[3p] The proof that some irrational and give rational considers . Which of these are true of it?
The proof that some irrational and give rational considers . Which of these are true of it?
Select all that apply
The answer is: It shows that one of two pairs works without saying which, It uses the fact that every real number is rational or irrational, It relies on being irrational
The answer is: It shows that one of two pairs works without saying which, It uses the fact that every real number is rational or irrational, It relies on being irrational
8.[2p] The constructive proof takes and the numbers to . For , which run of non-primes does it produce?
The constructive proof takes and the numbers to . For , which run of non-primes does it produce?
The answer is: to
The answer is: to
The answer is: to
9.[2p] Why does a direct proof of "if is even then is even" stall?
Why does a direct proof of "if is even then is even" stall?
The answer is: The hypothesis gives , which is not visibly twice an integer
The answer is: The hypothesis gives , which is not visibly twice an integer
The answer is: The hypothesis gives , which is not visibly twice an integer
10.[1p] What is the remainder given by the division algorithm when is divided by ?
What is the remainder given by the division algorithm when is divided by ?
11.[2p] In the uniqueness proof of the division algorithm, why does , with , force ?
In the uniqueness proof of the division algorithm, why does , with , force ?
The answer is: The only integer with is
The answer is: The only integer with is
The answer is: The only integer with is
12.[2p] A student proves by writing: ", so , so , which is true." What is wrong?
A student proves by writing: ", so , so , which is true." What is wrong?
The answer is: It reasons from the claim to a true statement, which proves nothing about the claim
The answer is: It reasons from the claim to a true statement, which proves nothing about the claim
The answer is: It reasons from the claim to a true statement, which proves nothing about the claim
13.[3p] Which of these pairs of proofs together establish ?
Which of these pairs of proofs together establish ?
Select all that apply
The answer is: A proof of and a proof of , A proof of and a proof of , A proof of and a proof of
The answer is: A proof of and a proof of , A proof of and a proof of , A proof of and a proof of
14.[1p] "For all real numbers and , " can be proved by saying "without loss of generality ".
"For all real numbers and , " can be proved by saying "without loss of generality ".
The answer is: False