Predicates and quantifiers
1.[2p] "All ravens are black" translates as
"All ravens are black" translates as
Correct
The answer is: $\forall x (Rx \rightarrow Bx)$
The answer is: $\forall x (Rx \rightarrow Bx)$
The answer is: $\forall x (Rx \rightarrow Bx)$
2.[2p] "Some ravens are black" translates as
"Some ravens are black" translates as
Correct
The answer is: $\exists x (Rx \wedge Bx)$
The answer is: $\exists x (Rx \wedge Bx)$
The answer is: $\exists x (Rx \wedge Bx)$
3.[3p] What is wrong with writing "some ravens are black" as ?
What is wrong with writing "some ravens are black" as ?
Correct
The answer is: A single non-raven in the domain makes it true, whatever ravens are like
The answer is: A single non-raven in the domain makes it true, whatever ravens are like
The answer is: A single non-raven in the domain makes it true, whatever ravens are like
4.[3p] Match each categorical form to its translation.
Match each categorical form to its translation.
All F are G
No F is G
Some F is G
Some F is not G
Show the answer
All F are G: No F is G: Some F is G: Some F is not G:
5.[3p] Of the 256 categorical syllogism forms, how many are valid under modern semantics, with no assumption that the terms are non-empty?
Of the 256 categorical syllogism forms, how many are valid under modern semantics, with no assumption that the terms are non-empty?
CorrectNot quite: 15
6.[2p] How many are valid once every term is assumed to name at least one thing?
How many are valid once every term is assumed to name at least one thing?
CorrectNot quite: 24
7.[2p] "Every unicorn in this room is on fire" is true in a room with no unicorns.
"Every unicorn in this room is on fire" is true in a room with no unicorns.
Correct
The answer is: True
8.[3p] Which formula is not a sentence?
Which formula is not a sentence?
Correct
The answer is: $\forall x\, Fx \rightarrow Gx$
The answer is: $\forall x\, Fx \rightarrow Gx$
The answer is: $\forall x\, Fx \rightarrow Gx$
9.[2p] and differ because
and differ because
Correct
The answer is: the first says not everything is $F$, the second that nothing is
The answer is: the first says not everything is $F$, the second that nothing is
The answer is: the first says not everything is $F$, the second that nothing is